(July 26, 2007) We had fun tonight – more visitors, and the chance to make and enjoy some tasty chili. Zdenek and Zdenka Roh are in town with baby Frankie in tow, all to see Ricky Skagg’s show at this weekend’s festival. After dinner we took a look at a Michal Tucny DVD that Zdenek wanted me to see – he bolted from the table right after we all finished to show me some of these video-clip versions of Tucny’s greatest hits.

Tucny, whose name literally and simply means “fat,” is an only somewhat portly fellow who was a star on the Czech scene for a while. (see the czech wikipedia article) apparently only sang American country (and therefore bluegrass to some extent–the two have long been confused/synonymous/mixed in Czech usage…more on this below) in the 1960s until Zelenaci asked him to join up in the 1970s (after Soviet-influenced “normalization”policies had limited use of English) and sing with them.
All the clips we saw seemed to feature some visual aspect of Western-ish Amerika – cowboy hats, leather fringe, feather headdresses. Emily took note, and started doing my work for me: she asked Zdenek how Czechs came to like and play bluegrass when what they heard earlier in the early 20th century western films would have been cowboy music in the vein of Gene Autry and Roy Rodgers…and how does this western style fit with bluegrass anyhow?
Zdenek explained that Czechs saw the movies, yes – but they HEARD the music carried by Armed Forces Network radio broadcasts from Munich, and it all mixed together, images and sounds. (this sort of mixing of Cowboy and Hillbilly is addressed in Peterson’s Creating Country Music, if anyone is interested) They liked the songs, and didn’t know to distinguish them based on genre – they were all just known as “country.” The Tucny DVD shows western wear as an important style featured continuously from the 60s to the 90s…..the hats, boots, and themes, imaginative tropes, vocabulary, images.
Czechs seem to have a different genre distinction framework…or way of dealing with genre. Parallel US reception/production of bluegrass dealth with “the western,” but wasn’t as suffused with it–and has come to mark “country” and “bluegrass” as related but very different. I guess this has to make sense; Czechs at mid-20th-century were engaged in a very different cultural political stage, one in which rock and roll was taking over through the 1950s, yes, but there were so many other things going on as well – Stalinist purges seem a bit different in scale than the Red Scares of McCarthyism–though they seem related.
I’m not sure exactly how the “acoustic instrument” and related traditionalist/purist rhetorics operated in the early years of Czech Americanism. They seem to have been there in Monroe’s work and life and in other situations (early festivals, connections to Appalachia and upland southern purity–see Rosenberg’s writing on the premature memorialization of Bill Monroe…by Bill Monroe.)
It seems clear that Czechs were operating in a situation where (American) identity-laden genre distinctions (as in “race records” and high/low bracketing) were less important than the performative value of the music – that it was American, and that it fit existing performative models, musical aptitudes, etc. But this is not the sort of thing that Zdenek was talking about. Seems like he was getting at something simpler: the music simply WORKED.